-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote: > We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because > one person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise > unanimous consensus from the group.
Hi Eran, Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we don't vote. So consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter of addressing valid technical issues that people raise. I shall re-read this thread and related earlier threads to see if the issues raised by Michael Thomas have been answered, but if there are open issues then we need to address them. Now, it might be that he hasn't accepted the answers provided, in which case he might be "in the rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not necessarily a simple matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on. However, I think you know that anyway. :) Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF+Zu F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l =5WMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
