Berry did make a consensus call when this was originally raised. EH
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:53 AM > To: Eran Hammer > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2- > threatmodel > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote: > > We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because one > > person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise unanimous > > consensus from the group. > > Hi Eran, > > Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we don't vote. > So > consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter of addressing > valid > technical issues that people raise. I shall re-read this thread and related > earlier threads to see if the issues raised by Michael Thomas have been > answered, but if there are open issues then we need to address them. Now, > it might be that he hasn't accepted the answers provided, in which case he > might be "in the rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not necessarily a > simple > matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on. > However, I think you know that anyway. :) > > Peter > > - -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF > +Zu > F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l > =5WMm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
