-12 addresses a few of the review comments, but not the majority of them.  
Those that it addresses are about "cty" and "typ". For instance, it does 
address Prateek's comment 2 (Why do we need both a "typ" claim and a "typ" 
header name?) and James' comment 7 (The doc redefines the "cty" header 
parameter).  (We no longer have both a "typ" claim and "typ" header parameter; 
"cty" is not redefined.)

The reality is that lately more of my time has gone into addressing the 
numerous JOSE comments, to try to get those documents that we depend upon to a 
stable point, than addressing the relatively small number of JWT comments.  But 
I will try to respond to the four sets of WGLC comments received this week, 
once my prep work for the JOSE meeting on Thursday is done.

                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 12:27 PM
To: [email protected] WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-12

Hi Mike, Hi all,

I was just trying to find out whether version -12 of the JWT spec addresses 
prior comments and the diff version of the document does not really give that 
indication. To me it seems that version -12 of the document was published to 
update -11 in an attempt to create an alignment with the JOSE work.

I believe it would be useful to respond to the review comments so that we can 
be sure that those had been taken into account (or that they had been rejected 
for a good reason).

Here are the comments I have found:

* Review by James Manger:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg11905.html

* Review by Mishra Prateek:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12003.html

* My own shepherd review:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12125.html

Ciao
Hannes

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to