Yep, that's what I'm looking for. Thanks.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Mike Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I’m fine updating the draft to say that the symmetric key can be carried
> in the “jwk” element in an unencrypted form if the JWT is itself
> encrypted.  That’s what you’re looking for, right?
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *John Bradley
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 30, 2015 11:29 AM
> *To:* Brian Campbell <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* oauth <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT PoP Key Semantics WGLC followup 2 (was Re:
> proof-of-possession-02 unencrypted oct JWK in encrypted JWT okay?)
>
>
>
> Yes encrypting the claim should only be required when the entire JWT is
> not encrypted.   I will have a look.
>
>
>
> John B.
>
>
>
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I raised the below question during the WGLC back in March but never got
> any response.
>
>
> JWE does add nontrivial size overhead to the message and in the case that
> a JWT containing a symmetric confirmation key is already a JWE, the spec
> would seem to require two layers of encryption and the associated over
> overhead that comes with it - even though the key is already encrypted by
> the outer JWE layer.
>
> I believe the draft should speak to how a symmetric key be represented as
> a claim in the clear when the encryption of it is provided the JWE/JWT that
> contains it.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Brian Campbell <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> When the JWT is itself encrypted as a JWE, would it not be reasonable to
> have a symmetric key be represented in the cnf claim with the jwk member as
> an unencrypted JSON Web Key?
>
> Is such a possibility left as an exercise to the reader? Or should it be
> more explicitly allowed or disallowed?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to