+1 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:01 AM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
> The normative text in Sec 4.1.3 is correct. > > redirect_uri > REQUIRED, if the "redirect_uri" parameter was included in the > authorization request as described in > Section 4.1.1, and their values MUST be identical. > > The example is arguably not the best worded. > > From the servers point of view the redirect_uri supplied in step A is > identical to the one it uses in step C. > > From the client’s point of view they receive a authorization response back > on the redirect URI with additional parameters, > so the redirect_uri value is only part of the response URI. > > I think his wording is better, but what is there is not strictly speaking > wrong. > > It is in non normative text, and the normative text is correct. > > I would mark it as editorial. > > John B. > > > On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > What do we do with the following errata, I don;t see any prior list > responses: > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14033.html > > > > Thank you! > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > Kathleen > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
