Thank you, both!  I'll note this as editorial and will also note that
the URI is the same in A and C, but that the wording is better, hence
editorial.

Kathleen

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Brian Campbell
<[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:01 AM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> The normative text in Sec 4.1.3 is correct.
>>
>> redirect_uri
>>          REQUIRED, if the "redirect_uri" parameter was included in the
>>          authorization request as described in
>>          Section 4.1.1, and their values MUST be identical.
>>
>> The example is arguably not the best worded.
>>
>> From the servers point of view the redirect_uri supplied in step A is
>> identical to the one it uses in step C.
>>
>> From the client’s point of view they receive a authorization response back
>> on the redirect URI with additional parameters,
>> so the redirect_uri value is only part of the response URI.
>>
>> I think his wording is better, but what is there is not strictly speaking
>> wrong.
>>
>> It is in non normative text, and the normative text is correct.
>>
>> I would mark it as editorial.
>>
>> John B.
>>
>> > On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > What do we do with the following errata, I don;t see any prior list
>> > responses:
>> >
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14033.html
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Kathleen
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OAuth mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to