Thank you, both! I'll note this as editorial and will also note that the URI is the same in A and C, but that the wording is better, hence editorial.
Kathleen On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Brian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:01 AM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The normative text in Sec 4.1.3 is correct. >> >> redirect_uri >> REQUIRED, if the "redirect_uri" parameter was included in the >> authorization request as described in >> Section 4.1.1, and their values MUST be identical. >> >> The example is arguably not the best worded. >> >> From the servers point of view the redirect_uri supplied in step A is >> identical to the one it uses in step C. >> >> From the client’s point of view they receive a authorization response back >> on the redirect URI with additional parameters, >> so the redirect_uri value is only part of the response URI. >> >> I think his wording is better, but what is there is not strictly speaking >> wrong. >> >> It is in non normative text, and the normative text is correct. >> >> I would mark it as editorial. >> >> John B. >> >> > On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Kathleen Moriarty >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > What do we do with the following errata, I don;t see any prior list >> > responses: >> > >> > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14033.html >> > >> > Thank you! >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Kathleen >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OAuth mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
