+1 to Prateek's comments -- Dick
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Prateek Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > > While this work addresses a gap in the existing OAuth specification set, I am > very concerned that this > incremental extension will lead to even more confusion around the areas of > “scope”, “audience” and “resource server”. > > I think we should try to solve this problem via a framework that provides > better guidance and implementation > models for OAuth use-cases. In other words, I feel that a broader discussion > is needed here. > > >> On Apr 7, 2016, at 4:11 PM, Justin Richer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I support adoption of this document as a starting point for working group >> work. >> >> — Justin >> >> >>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> this is the call for adoption of 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0', see >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators/ >>> >>> Please let us know by April 20th whether you accept / object to the >>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth >>> working group. >>> >>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Buenos >>> Aires then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want. >>> >>> The feedback at the BA IETF meeting was the following: ~10 persons >>> for accepting the document and 0 persons against. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes & Derek >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
