Thanks for the additional section on refresh_tokens. Some additional recommendations...

1. By default refresh_tokens are bound to the user's authenticated session. When the authenticated session expires or is terminated (whether by the user or for some other reason) the refresh_tokenis implicitly revoked. 2. Clients that need to obtain a refresh_token that exists beyond the lifetime of the user's authentication session MUST indicate this need by requesting the "offline_access" scope (https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#OfflineAccess). This provides for a user consent event making it clear to the user that the client is requesting access even when the user's authentication session expires. This then becomes the default for mobile apps as the refresh_token should not be tied to the web session used to authorize the app. 3. The AS MAY consider putting an upper bound on the lifetime of a refresh_token (e.g. 1 year). There is no real need to issue a refresh_token that is good indefinitely.

This is in addition to the other best practices described.

Thanks,
George

On 11/20/18 2:32 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
Hi all,

the new revision contains the following changes:

* added section on refresh tokens
* additional justifications for recommendation for code
* refactored 2.1 in order to distinguish CSRF, authz response replay and mix-up 
(based on feedback by Joseph Heenan)
* added requirement to authenticate clients during code exchange (PKCE or 
client credential) to 2.1.1.
* changed occurrences of SHALL to MUST

As always: looking forward for your feedback.

kind regards,
Torsten.

Am 20.11.2018 um 20:26 schrieb [email protected]:


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF.

        Title           : OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice
        Authors         : Torsten Lodderstedt
                          John Bradley
                          Andrey Labunets
                          Daniel Fett
        Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-10.txt
        Pages           : 38
        Date            : 2018-11-20

Abstract:
   This document describes best current security practice for OAuth 2.0.
   It updates and extends the OAuth 2.0 Security Threat Model to
   incorporate practical experiences gathered since OAuth 2.0 was
   published and covers new threats relevant due to the broader
   application of OAuth 2.0.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-10
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-10


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to