Hi Francesca,
Per my reply to Murray, the IANA registration procedure language was updated in
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as
discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now
says:
"The IANA escalation process is followed when the Designated Experts are not
responsive within 14 days."
Thanks again for taking the time to review.
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Jones
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 6:39 AM
To: Francesca Palombini <[email protected]>; The IESG
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)
Thank you for reviewing the document, Francesca. Would it be more appropriate
to change the text to say the following?
"Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days
can be brought to the IESG for approval, per Section 4.10 of RFC 8126."
Best wishes,
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2024 4:50 AM
To: The IESG <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for this document.
Many thanks to Mike Bishop for the HTTPDIR review.
One more IANA point. Section 8 states:
> Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than
> 21 days
can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the [email protected] mailing list)
for resolution.
Maybe it is me not being a native speaker, but it is not clear to me what is
requested of the IESG. If the goal is to add a "IESG Approval" (see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126#section-4.10 ), then it should be stated
clearly, and by the way I do not think that is a good idea. If it is
escalation, then IANA already has procedures in place for that, and I don't
think this text adds anything to that. Can you expand?
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
