Hi Dapeng, Karl, Yaron, Ron, Kieran, Interested. I'd like to add one piece to the problem statement.
Both layers in the thread check against the approved Mission. That's Yaron's authority metadata before issuance and Ron's record comparison after it. But the Mission starts as the agent's Intent. The user said "buy product A" before any Intent existed and what they approve is the agent's reading of it. Karl's Mandate commits to that approved intent so it carries the reading rather than the instruction. That piece is evidence of the instruction that started the Mission. 4.3 of Karl's submission evidence draft has the exchange establish the presenter which is the client. The person who gave the instruction isn't a party to it. The evidence also has to survive shaping and 4.2 only lets it name the shaped intent_hash if the type defines a lineage from input_digest. I'm happy to write the requirement up for whichever draft takes it. Blake _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
