-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Well, here goes! I have a lot of questions, but I'll start with the > basics. Perhaps I can post the information I gather to the wiki for > others. Would be great.
> Apparently version 0.4 of the protocol breaks compatibility. Is this > a major break? It is. TLS is not the only reason why 0.4 and 0.3 are not compatible (although it is a good excuse ;) ). But if I remember correctly, the only major thing that has also changed is the chunk handling during the document synchronisation which is now chunk-based (chunks are coherent parts of a document that a single user has written) instead of line-based. > Obviously the addition of TLS is a big deal, but if I developed > against 0.3 (much easier because I can use telnet to connect) would I > have to totally rewrite everything to make it 0.4-compatible? I strongly recommend to develop against 0.4 although it *should* not be too hard to make it 0.4-compatible. You may just use gnutls-cli to connect to an obby-0.4 server and use it like telnet. To run it as a server is somewhat more complicated but phil had it already running once. He might tell you how when he is back (which is tomorrow, if I am right). -- armin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEWh9phOtxKlDYm6cRAt8vAKCbq55Zc/JWBqjXlSFvfvQ+ODu5pgCg4c5U tvJ45OY8Tz+nFD4PzLFRlEg= =BpP4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ obby-users mailing list [email protected] http://draenor.its-toasted.org/mailman/listinfo/obby-users
