I fear that lawyers and good debaters or negotiators will have an advantage
here, so they must be negatively handicapped to start with. Those who are
meek and non-confrontational should receive a several second handicap.
I would like to put forth conclusively that I am of the meek variety and if
you don't agree with that I will sue for those seconds and minutes.
Simpson
-
Celia wrote:
Also, when rolling through the countryside this afternoon, and thinking
about Simpson's concerns about sore toes, busy work weeks and
individualized handicapping, I thought of this (I guess I should have
been riding faster):
Idiosyncratic Exceed Expectations Event (IEEE)
Riders receive an individual handicap based on past performances, but
afterwards (before knowing others' results) can appeal to a
knowledgeable panel of judges (say, those who show up at Mugs after the
event!) for an added "compassionate" handicap.
------
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Club Office: [EMAIL PROTECTED], (613) 230-1064
Web/mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb
Newsletter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb/Newsletter
==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiDo.a2i8p1
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
