Sedikit ketolong harga minyak yg naik kali Mbah...kecuali minyaknya jebol
lagi?

*NEWC Index*
  13-Feb-09 80.28  20-Feb-09 76.34  27-Feb-09 65.32  06-Mar-09 61.70
13-Mar-09 62.10

On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 2:59 PM, jsx_consultant <
jsx-consult...@centrin.net.id> wrote:

>   Masih nunggu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dari emiten BUMI...
>
> Tapi ada yg lebih penting:
> - Nasib semua emiten coal saat ini lagi menunggu apakah
> harga coal akan jebol dibawah 60 dollar.
>
> Biasa pak Oentoeng yg bisa memprediksi ini...
>
> --- In obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com <obrolan-bandar%40yahoogroups.com>,
> rudd haas <rudd...@...> wrote:
> >
> > Mbah, kalau ga keberatan , sebaiknya comparison di tambah dengan BUMI..
> > biar aple 2 aple
> >
> > BUMI vs PTBA vs ITMG
> >
> > Bagaimana pun BUMi is the biggest Coal player
> >
> >
> > --- On Sun, 3/15/09, jsx_consultant <jsx-consult...@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: jsx_consultant <jsx-consult...@...>
> > Subject: [obrolan-bandar] Re: PTBA vs ITMG comparison(Mbah)
> > To: obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com <obrolan-bandar%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 2:30 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mau sebagus apapun laporan keuangan emiten Coal, embah masih
> > menunggu nasib grafik harga Coal, KECUALI TA nya CANTIK...
> >
> > --- In obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com, "adjies2000" <ad2000@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mbah,
> > >
> > > Kalau ada waktu tolong diteropong PTBA vs ITMG, supaya PD Tektok nya
> > >
> > > PS: Maklum Investor, belum punya Live Chart, Thanks
> > >
> > > Dengan
> > >
> > > "Testing is by far the most important of the low volume buy signals. As
> we shall refer to the subject many
> > > times, in what follows, it will be worthwhile to digress here for a
> moment and look at the subject in detail.
> > > What is a "test" and why do we place such importance on this action?
> > > A large trader who has been accumulating an individual stock or a
> section of the market can mark prices
> > > down with some confidence, but he cannot mark prices up when others are
> selling into the same market
> > > without losing money. To attempt to mark prices up into selling is
> extremely poor business, so poor in fact,
> > > it will lead to bankruptcy if one persists.
> > > The danger to any professional operator who is bullish, is supply
> coming into his market (selling), because
> > > on any rally, selling on the opposite side of the market will act as
> resistance to the rally and may even
> > > swamp his buying. Bullish professionals will have to absorb this
> selling if they want higher prices to be
> > > maintained. If they are forced to absorb selling at higher levels (by
> more buying), the selling may become
> > > so great that prices are forced down. They will have been forced to buy
> stock at an unacceptably high level
> > > and will lose money if the market falls.
> > > Rallies in any stock-based indices are usually short-lived after you
> have seen supply in the background.
> > > The professional trader knows that given enough time (with bad news,
> persistent down-moves, even time
> > > itself with nothing much happening) the floating supply can be removed
> from the market, but he has to be
> > > sure the supply has been completely removed before trying to trade up
> his holding. The best way to find
> > > out is to rapidly mark the prices down. This challenges any bears
> around to come out into the open and
> > > show their hand. The amount of volume (activity) of trading as the
> market is marked down will tell the
> > > professional how much selling there is. Low volume, or low trading
> activity, shows there is little selling on
> > > the mark-down . This will also catch any stops below the market, which
> is a way of buying at still lower
> > > prices. (This action is sometimes known as a springboard)
> > > High volume, or high activity, shows that there is in fact selling
> (supply) on the mark-down . This process
> > > is known as testing. You can have successful tests on low volume and
> other types of tests on high volume,
> > > usually on `bad news`. This not only catches stops, but shakes the
> market out as well, making the way
> > > easier for higher prices. Testing is a good sign of strength (as long
> as you have strength in the
> > > background). Usually, a successful test (on low volume) tells you that
> the market is ready to rise
> > > immediately, whilst a higher volume test usually results in a temporary
> up-move, and will be subject to a
> > > re-test of the same price area again at a later time. This action
> sometimes results in a "W" shape. This
> > > pattern is sometimes referred to as a "dead cat bounce" or a "double
> bottom". The "W" shape results from
> > > the action of re-testing an area that had too much supply before.
> > > Master
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com, Bambang Kansah
> <bambangkansah@ > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Mbah, kalau aku sih pilih PTBA aja d, yg deviden-nya bikin mimpi jadi
> > > > indah... :-D
> > > >
> > > > On 3/15/09, jsx_consultant <jsx-consultant@ > wrote:
> > > > > Forex gain is included in Net Profit but is EXCLUDED from Operating
> > > > > Profit. So you can measure ITMG performance by looking at Operating
> > > > > profit...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com, ruzli <indeksbei3000@ >
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dear Mbah
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please see ITMG FOREX DERIVATIF GAIN on the Financial Statement.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2009/3/15 jsx_consultant <jsx-consultant@ >:
> > > > >> > For steady and continuous growth:
> > > > >> > - Compare the same quarter in diffferet year untuk mengeliminasi
> > > > >> > efek cyclis (lebaran, musim dll)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > For SPOTTING melemahnya performance emiten:
> > > > >> > - bandingkan dengan quarter sebelumnya.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Kedua duanya punya kegunaan.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > --- In obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com, Rei <highwaystar91@ >
> wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Itu dibandingkan Q4 vs Q3 2008 Mbah? Kalo gak salah Mbah pernah
> bilang
> > > > >> >> mengenai hal ini, biasanya kan yg dilihat perbandingan antara
> quarter
> > > > >> >> yg
> > > > >> >> sama tapi tahun berbeda, mis. Q3 2007 vs Q3 2008, Q4 2007 vs Q4
> 2008...
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:21 AM, jsx_consultant <
> > > > >> >> jsx-consultant@ > wrote:
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> > PTBA vs ITMG comparison
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > http://www.investda ta.net/QZ84COA9. TXT
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> > Note:
> > > > >> >> > - ITMG has postive Q4 growth over Q3, see column 14,15,16
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >> >
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> 
>

Kirim email ke