Pictures attached. On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:47 AM Adam Armstrong via observium < [email protected]> wrote:
> so many words, but no pictures. > > Corwin Ziegler Hunts via observium wrote on 2024-06-25 19:13: > > Hi Observium team, > > We're having issues with some of the generated graphs. Some of our devices > report the light level received by SFPs using mW (rather than dBm). We are > on the latest stable revision (13582). > > Issue 1: The graphs generated by Observium for these sensors usually show > an excessive scale of at least -100 mW to 100 mW when the data in the > specified time interval are entirely within the range 100 nW to 1 mW and > usually only a small chunk of that. The calculated minimum and maximum > values shown below the graph are correct. These graphs worked properly in > the past with a prior version of Observium. > > Issue 2: Selecting and deselecting the Force Autoscale option appears to > have no effect on the generated graph or displayed rrd graph command. > Manually running the generated rrd graph command after removing the > "--alt-autoscale" option results in a good graph. > > Here is the raw SNMP output for one of the these sensors showing a current > value of 0.5560mW: > ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorType.1000004631 = INTEGER: watts(6) > ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorScale.1000004631 = INTEGER: milli(8) > ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorPrecision.1000004631 = INTEGER: 4 > ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorValue.1000004631 = INTEGER: 5560 > ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorOperStatus.1000004631 = INTEGER: ok(1) > > Corwin > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
