We updated to r13611. The graphs are much better now. On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:58 AM Adam Armstrong via observium < observium@lists.observium.org> wrote:
> Try r13609! > > adam. > > Corwin Ziegler Hunts via observium wrote on 2024-08-05 20:13: > > These sensors show up as power sensors rather than as dBm (or SNR). > > Could the "autoscale" button simply toggle whether the "--alt-autoscale" > option is set? With the default state of the toggle coming from the current > logic? > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 8:09 PM Adam Armstrong <ad...@observium.org> > wrote: > >> I can't think of any really good ways to handle this. The way the graphs >> are generated doesn't make having a per-type autoscale setting easy. >> >> The "autoscale" button in the UI forces it on for those graphs where it's >> normally off. >> >> You could try removing the 'snr' from the case statement setting the >> scale min/max from html/includes/graphs/sensor/graph.inc.php and see if it >> improves rendering for these graphs (without breaking the rest of the snr >> graphs). >> >> If that doesn't improve it, perhaps we need an explicit toggle to turn >> the autoscale off, though the logic for the autoscale decision code is >> already pretty messy and confusing. >> >> adam. >> >> >> Corwin Ziegler Hunts via observium wrote on 2024-07-27 00:54: >> >> Is there any guidance towards resolving these issues? Manually logging in >> to the Observium server to generate graphs every time someone needs to >> investigate these SFP light levels is disruptive and time consuming. Just >> being able to prevent the broken "--alt-autoscale" option from being passed >> to rrd from within the web UI (issue #2) would help significantly. We have >> a Professional subscription. >> >> Corwin >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 2:03 PM Corwin Ziegler Hunts < >> corwin.ziegler.hu...@nextlevel.net> wrote: >> >>> Pictures attached. >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:47 AM Adam Armstrong via observium < >>> observium@lists.observium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> so many words, but no pictures. >>>> >>>> Corwin Ziegler Hunts via observium wrote on 2024-06-25 19:13: >>>> >>>> Hi Observium team, >>>> >>>> We're having issues with some of the generated graphs. Some of our >>>> devices report the light level received by SFPs using mW (rather than dBm). >>>> We are on the latest stable revision (13582). >>>> >>>> Issue 1: The graphs generated by Observium for these sensors usually >>>> show an excessive scale of at least -100 mW to 100 mW when the data in the >>>> specified time interval are entirely within the range 100 nW to 1 mW and >>>> usually only a small chunk of that. The calculated minimum and maximum >>>> values shown below the graph are correct. These graphs worked properly in >>>> the past with a prior version of Observium. >>>> >>>> Issue 2: Selecting and deselecting the Force Autoscale option appears >>>> to have no effect on the generated graph or displayed rrd graph command. >>>> Manually running the generated rrd graph command after removing the >>>> "--alt-autoscale" option results in a good graph. >>>> >>>> Here is the raw SNMP output for one of the these sensors showing a >>>> current value of 0.5560mW: >>>> ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorType.1000004631 = INTEGER: watts(6) >>>> ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorScale.1000004631 = INTEGER: milli(8) >>>> ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorPrecision.1000004631 = INTEGER: 4 >>>> ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorValue.1000004631 = INTEGER: 5560 >>>> ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB::entPhySensorOperStatus.1000004631 = INTEGER: ok(1) >>>> >>>> Corwin >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org > To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org > > > _______________________________________________ > observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org > To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org >
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- observium@lists.observium.org To unsubscribe send an email to observium-le...@lists.observium.org