To IDJW: you actually said:
... they will not use aggression on the innocent... didn't you? Since when is it the police's job to determine who is innocent and who is not, do they suddenly have judicial powers? Blatant... > > > > the only way we could ever become a respectable neighbourhood is if you > > let the SAPS be and allow them to do their job without interference. > > > they will not use aggression on the innocent, so if you read or hear or > > witness so-called police brutality, then it must surely be justified by > > the fact that they are at war with a brutal element out there. > > > the SAPS never satisfies anybody, because they are either too > > non-responsive / inadequate in their response time to crime reporting or > > they are overly aggressive! > > how could they ever fulfill their obligations to the citizens of obz if > > they are criticized perpetually. > > > eventually they will be forced to adopt a philosophical approach and > > beware the good citizens of obz, crime will prosper,..it's a matter of > > time > > > BUT; if we let them do what they do best, there is hope yet. > > > my message to the "cry for the criminal" lobbiests out there is that they > > should stick to what they are qualified to do in life, whatever that might > > be and leave our cops who are qualified to clean our streets to do so, in > > order for our children to one day safely wander it again > > > > I cannot believe the tone on this board, to be exactly Johnny Wessels > > > repeated vigilatism, incitement whatever one must call it. > > > "one of gratitude to the police for actually being PRO-ACTIVE in > > > keepin the slime UNDER CONTROL ON OUR BEHALF." > > > Who are you Johnny, the law? The government? Pro-active police? When > > > they beat people up? > > > POSITIVE SPIN? > > > Do you really not understand the concept of law and order? Condoning a > > > violent police force, actually welcoming that, is totally not > > > acceptable. Calling it a preventative measure? > > > This is so warped, it is quite amazing. > > > Oh, and please, nobody come now and tell me Johnny was emotional, and > > > that's why he talks like this, it's plainly his attitude and you > > > should be ashamed if you support him. > > > I am part of this NHW just as much as Johnny is and I resent him > > > talking about: "WE", when he says: "We always endeavor to rather deter > > > crime as opposed to reacting to it." > > > Or who the hell are you referring to? > > > If anything or anyone should be banned from posting here, it's Johnny > > > Wessels' fascist comments. In the interest of a respectable > > > neighbourhood watch. > > > Melanie- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
