As I said: I'm not an expert. Let's wait for the police reply. Still does not take away the fact that apparently the Obs community is in two minds about what it wants.
Regards Teun On 19 March 2010 08:42, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Quoted from the constitution:- > > > > 14. Privacy > > > > Everyone has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have > > > > 1. their person or home searched; > > 2. their property searched; > > 3. their possessions seized; or > > 4. the privacy of their communications infringed. > > > > Its pretty clear! > > > > Trev > > > > 2. Supremacy of Constitution > > This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct > inconsistent with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it > must be fulfilled. > > Makes you think ......... > -- Teun Baartman 083 298 1009 021 448 3584 Please consider the environment before you print this e-mail!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to obsnw+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
