Thanks Teun for this posting. You make good points around the abilty of
crime to get us hot under the collar. I endorse your call for cool heads to
prevail in the future.
Let's count to 10 before we go off pop at each-other.
There are many people devoting a lot of time, much of it voluntary, to a
focused effort to clear Observatory up over the next few months. Good strong
people are stepping forward to take our suburb back from the slumlords and
drug peddlers. I am confident those efforts are on the verge of bearing
fruit.
Brian
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Michael Kempen <[email protected]>wrote:

> Thank you Teun.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "teun" <[email protected]>
> To: "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 1:34 PM
> Subject: [obsnw] Re: Police harassment
>
>
> Open letter to Mr Marais (and other Observatory residents)
>
> Dear Mr Marais
>
> I have noted your e-mail and those of the other people in Observatory.
> You accuse me of being disingenuous, so let's be candid.
>
> I originally reacted rather angrily to an e-mail from Trevor Hughes.
> Where did that anger come from? After some soul-searching I must admit
> that it was not directed at Trevor, but at you. In a few e-mails,
> which you wrote to me and which were also published to other members
> of the Observatory community, you attacked me viciously and in a very
> personal manner while making the point that the Woodstock police was
> not doing enough in Observatory. When I read Trevor's e-mail, I
> somehow made the connection with your personal attack on me, probably
> because the subject of the e-mails (police (non)-action) was similar
> and made a remark generalising the Obs community.
>
> I must concede that this was wrong of me and I sincerely apologise to
> the residents of Observatory.
>
> Having said that, I would also like to make the point it is clear to
> me that once again crime did get the better of us. Not only can we
> fall victim to crime, but crime is also such a dividing, polarising
> and segregating force. In other words: crime divides and rules. And
> that is so wrong and disheartening.
> I am pretty sure that we all want the same thing and most of us are
> working hard to try and achieve this: to be able to live and work in a
> safe environment. We should not let squabbles among ourselves and
> pointing of fingers deter us from seeing the big picture.
>
> I fell into that trap and I am very sorry about that. I hope that we
> can turn this into a hard lesson learned and move on from here in the
> right direction.
>
> Best regards
> Teun Baartman
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 21, 12:07 pm, Kris Marais <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In my capacity as a resident and property owner in Observatory i
>> absolutely endorse Justin's message below.
>> Teun this is yet another example of the disingenuous tone of your recent
>> email wherein you make snide reference to 'Observatory' and it appears
>> to me you are "playing to the gallery." (the gallery? "anybody or group
>> of people copied in your email who would like to see Observatory insulted)
>> Kris Marais
>>
>>
>>
>> Justin Ashley wrote:
>>
>> > Teun, Trevor related a personal experience he had and objected to,
>> > which is his democratic right. He did not make any attempt to
>> > indicate that the views he expressed were representative of any
>> > organisation or community.
>>
>> > The first two paragraphs or your initial reply to his post are
>> > reasonable and clear. The gratuitous insult to the Observatory
>> > community that you decided to throw into your last paragraph is
>> > offensive and untrue, and I think deserves an apology from you.
>>
>> > Regards
>>
>> > Justin
>>
>> > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
>> > Behalf Of *Teun Baartman
>> > *Sent:* 19 March 2010 08:55 AM
>> > *To:* Trevor Hughes
>> > *Cc:* [email protected]; Brian & Sue Amery; Woodstock SAPS; David
>> > Raphael; Cedric Thomas
>> > *Subject:* [obsnw] Re: Police harassment
>>
>> > As I said: I'm not an expert. Let's wait for the police reply.
>>
>> > Still does not take away the fact that apparently the Obs community is
>> > in two minds about what it wants.
>>
>> > Regards
>>
>> > Teun
>>
>> > On 19 March 2010 08:42, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Trevor Hughes <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> > > Quoted from the constitution:-
>>
>> > > 14. Privacy
>>
>> > > Everyone has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to
>> > have
>>
>> > > 1. their person or home searched;
>> > > 2. their property searched;
>> > > 3. their possessions seized; or
>> > > 4. the privacy of their communications infringed.
>>
>> > > Its pretty clear!
>>
>> > > Trev
>>
>> > 2. Supremacy of Constitution
>>
>> > This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct
>> > inconsistent with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it
>> > must be fulfilled.
>>
>> > Makes you think .........
>>
>> > --
>> > Teun Baartman
>> > 083 298 1009
>> > 021 448 3584
>>
>> > Please consider the environment before you print this e-mail!!
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
>>
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected]
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en
>>
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > obsnw+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the
>> > words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>
>> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> > signature database 4957 (20100319) __________
>>
>> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> >http://www.eset.com
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
>>
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > [email protected]
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en
>>
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > obsnw+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the
>> > words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to obsnw+
> unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE
> ME" as the subject.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
>
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to obsnw+
> unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE
> ME" as the subject.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to obsnw+unsubscribegooglegroups.com 
or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to