yes but Jonathan's point is that 'that anger and frustration' be articulated in a clear and objective way. The letter looses all credibility by engaging in oblique suppositions and perhaps even harms our case.
I understand he's angry, but its dismissed by anyone in authority as the mud-slinging villager rousing the mob. As Jonathan said, stick the evidence. This doesn't help anyone, no matter how much they support the sentiment. trev On 24 Jan 2011, at 9:55 AM, Justin Ashley wrote: > I fully support Teun’s letter. I don’t think he is over stating his position > at all. > > Pubs and clubs have their place in any community as places of entertainment > and relaxation. There are establishments in Observatory that operate > responsibly towards both their clients and the surrounding community. > > But there are many who do not and I do not think I am going out on a limb to > say that Teun’s letter articulates well the frustration and anger of the > community as a whole towards the unprincipled owners and operators of these > places. They must be taught that thumbing their noses at regulations and > laws will have consequences. > > Thanks Teun. We look forward to more action! > > Justin Ashley > Chairperson: Obsid > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
