This is an emotional debate.  I agree with Trevor on the fundamental issue
of decriminalising the use of drugs, although maybe not with his argument as
to why.  The War on Drugs internationally is not a successful one - billions
of dollars are spent every year with very little effect on established
patterns of illegal drug consumption.  Drug fashions come and go.  Currently
tik (chrystal meth) abuse is the issue everyone is worried about here in the
Western Cape.  But in the USA, where the chrystal meth phenomenon first
surfaced, the epidemic has peaked, and usage is dropping heavily year on
year from its peaks in the mid-noughties.  Why?  Because younger people can
see the devastation it has caused amongst their (slightly older) elders.
But its not as if they are turning away from drugs.  They are going back to
the ever-useful marijuana.  A drug that has never been linked to any
substance abuse deaths, never been linked to violent anti-social behaviour,
whose users generally stay home and tune out peacefully.  In many states in
the USA, medical marijuana use is legal - and these stats have literally
millions of marijuana users now (legitimate medicinal ones).

 

And the criminalisation of drugs simply finances violent criminal gangs -
the people who are currently devastating Mexico and our own Cape Flats.
They make vast profits from the drug trade and use that money to wreak vast
social havoc.

 

Imagine a world where drug use is legal.  And all those millions spent on
locking away dealers and users is spent on building rehab clinics, and
paying social workers and doctors and nurses to genuinely help addicts
instead of marginalising and criminalising them.  A well-financed and
well-researched treatment regime that can help get people back on their feet
without the stigma or personal trauma of a criminal record.  A world where
criminal gangs can't make money out of the drug trade because legitimate
tax-paying AND REGULATED businesses are selling drugs.  The law could be
used to regulate access - no selling to under-21's, no selling to known
addicts - rather direct them to the state-financed drug treatment centres.
A bit like the gambling industry is heavily regulated today in SA.  You may
not like the fact that casinos exist in SA - but surely this is more
preferably underground gambling dens?

 

I believe that ultimately this outcome is inevitable.  Conservative
publications like the Economist and Atlantic have been putting forward
essentially this argument for many years.  It is more humane and accepting
of human nature than the current puritanical, prohibitionist and
hypocritical regime.  I mean, how often are politicians caught in the act of
drug use.  The last 3 US presidents and the current British PM have admitted
to youthful experimentation with drugs!

 

But until this more civilised world emerges, we have to apply the law as it
stands, and I applaud VS and SAPS for the work that they are doing to reduce
both the dealing and consumption of drugs within Observatory.

 

Justin

(these opinions are my own and I do not write this as Chair of Obsid)

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Walsh, Carys
Sent: 23 September 2011 10:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [obsnw] Drug arrest

 

Coming from a family that has been torn apart by drugs - I cannot agree with
you, Trevor. You clearly have no idea of the complete devastation that drugs
can wreck on a person and all of those who are close to them. 

 

Regards,

 

Carys Villet
Senior Tax Consultant
International Executive Services

 

KPMG Services (Proprietary) Limited 
PO Box 4609      
Cape Town         
South Africa       
8000                    

 

Tel:          +27 21 408 7468
Mobile:     +27 83 440 2054 
Fax:         +27 86 528 1458 
        
 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 

 

KPMG is rated AAA (equating to a Level 2 contributor) in terms of
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Trevor Hughes
Sent: 23 September 2011 10:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [obsnw] Drug arrest

 

I just cannot understand the sense of satisfaction at the arrest of a 26
year old female cocaine user.

What good has this done Observatory specifically and society in general.
Apart from causing more work for the police and courts, possible needless
financial hardship for the arrestee and her family and having all sorts of
further implications should this go to court and she is found guilty of a
offense.

Was this 26 year old female a threat to society because she had 1gr of
cocaine in her possession?

What if this was your daughter/sister/wife/friend? Would you be so pleased
at this arrest?

What if the substance had been a cannabis joint? Would you still be so
pleased? Do you smoke cannabis? Do you do other drugs? Does your child,
spouse, wife, neighbour, dentist or doctor? Do you know anyone who does
drugs? Would you be happy to see them arrested?

This arrest is complete waste of time and financial resources that could be
better spent policing actual crime.

Yes holding drugs is a crime - does not make it morally wrong. Remember
apartheid? 

This young woman (could be your daughter/sister/wife) is now being used a
measure of success in the fight against crime? Nonsense!

Legalize all drugs now! Read up on the success this has had in Portugal over
the last ten years. Arresting users serves no useful purpose and to gloat
about it or praise it even less.

Think about it - why should the government have any right to tell you what
you can an cannot consume. Prohibition is a failure. Always has been. Always
will be.

It all makes so little sense when you consider that nicotine and alcohol are
freely available and condoned and encouraged  -  try going to a party and
social gathering and be caught with an alcoholic beverage in your hand.  

Peace out and enjoy your drugs of choice safely. (even if they are the
horrid alcohol and nicotine!)

Trev

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.

 
 
 
 
 
 
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the 
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be
unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement
letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any
attachments that do not relate to the official business of the firm are
neither
given nor endorsed by it.
 
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 
 
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you.  
KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a 
Swiss cooperative that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
Cooperative ("KPMG International")
provides no services to clients. 
Each member firm of KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member 
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
 
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
 
 
 
-- 


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.


To post to this group, send email to [email protected].


To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].


 
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.


 
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.

Reply via email to