On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:11:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgold...@suse.de>
> Subject: ocfs2: acknowledge return value of ocfs2_error()
>
> Caveat: This may return -EROFS for a read case, which seems wrong. This
> is happening even without this patch series though. Should we convert
> EROFS to EIO?
I must be doing something wrong because in the kernels I've looked at,
ocfs2_error() is a void function.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
