On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:20:43 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mfas...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:11:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgold...@suse.de> > > Subject: ocfs2: acknowledge return value of ocfs2_error() > > > > Caveat: This may return -EROFS for a read case, which seems wrong. This > > is happening even without this patch series though. Should we convert > > EROFS to EIO? > > I must be doing something wrong because in the kernels I've looked at, > ocfs2_error() is a void function. The preceding patch (ocfs2: add errors=continue) changed the ocfs2_error() return type. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
