BTW, how many bugs have you logged? The least you can do is just that.
Whining will not get you anywhere.
Sunil Mushran wrote:
Alexei_Roudnev wrote:
Does Oracle tests behavior of OCFSv2 in case of:
- 1,000 different users;
YES. By users I assume you mean processes. 500-1000 per node
on a 8 node cluster.
- host1 appends to the file and host2 truncate it; then host3 rename
file.
YES
- file is removed on node1 but still open on node2;
YES
- one node creates file and other try to rename another file into it.
YES
- 900 GB file sytem and we create 1,000,000 directories with
5,000,000 files in it
No, we limit 32000 files in a directory. Doc in the FAQ.
- directory with 100,000 files inside
No. See above.
- file name length 512 symbols in UTF8 encoding
No, as charactersets are not handled by the fs. But knock yourself out.
- we run 'mkdir x; rmdir x' in a loop for a week...
What so magical about a week. Again, knock yourself out.
etc etc...
??
I am more concerned about OCFSv2 usage as a common file system, and
not so many about LVM + OCFSv2. OCFSv2 looks pretty stable when used
for limited ## of files and limited usage scenario (such as Oracle
usage) but not as a common file system used by thousand of students
with unlimited fantasy...
No, it does not make your morning coffee.
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
