No, I mean _USER = user id_.
Sunil, I am sure that OCFSv2 will be 100% reliable common use file system in
1 - 2 years from now. ITY is already reliable enough for non-critical
applocations. But it should not be used for 100% critical applications for
now, except when you have not other chances, and except when it is 100%
certificd combination of software (Linux version, application version and so
on). Single heartbeat channel is 1 proiblem; selffencing in all cases (even
when no activity on FS) is another, not tested in big installations with the
common use files is reason #3.
Remember memory leak an creating / removing file loop? You an run it for 1
hour and 1 day, but it killed server in 1 week. Usually 1 week is enough for
any leak to kill the server.
- 900 GB file sytem and we create 1,000,000 directories with 5,000,000
files in it
No, we limit 32000 files in a directory. Doc in the FAQ.
- directory with 100,000 files inside
No. See above.
- file name length 512 symbols in UTF8 encoding
No, as charactersets are not handled by the fs. But knock yourself out.
- we run 'mkdir x; rmdir x' in a loop for a week...
What so magical about a week. Again, knock yourself out.
etc etc...
??
I am more concerned about OCFSv2 usage as a common file system, and not
so many about LVM + OCFSv2. OCFSv2 looks pretty stable when used for
limited ## of files and limited usage scenario (such as Oracle usage) but
not as a common file system used by thousand of students with unlimited
fantasy...
No, it does not make your morning coffee.
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
