You need OpenFST only for building and optimizing language models, and the command line tools should be good enough for even that.
Leptonica is used for text/image segmentation; I'm actually not sure what happens (if anything) if you don't configure it right now, since text/image segmentation is not yet well integrated with the layout analysis. As text/image segmentation goes, Leptonica is pretty good. In 0.5, we're going to replace it with our own text/image segmentation (which should be better) and then the dependency will just go away. Tom On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 22:52, [email protected]<[email protected]> wrote: > > Whilst rationalizing my Mac build I notice that I had previously been > building without leptonica or OpenFST. > > The Ubuntu build does use leptonica, but doesn't seem to link OpenFST? > > Are these required or optional, and do I expect better performance > with or without them? > > Cheers > > Duncan > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
