On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 09:53, Brad Hards<[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there a high level description of what ocropus is meant to look like (in > terms of dependencies) in the longer term?
The plan for October is here: http://code.google.com/p/ocropus/wiki/ReleaseNotes > Right now, I'm interested in getting it running on something other than > ubuntu. Obviously there are quite a lot of dependencies, and some of those are > problematic (especially leptonica). Leptonica isn't strictly speaking needed right now, and it will not be required in 0.5 (in fact, it may not be used at all). We have already removed the dependency on Tesseract. You could help us a lot if you contribute a build file for OCRopus for whatever your platform is. The preferred way is in terms of patches to autoconf, but if you have a platform specific build- or makefile, that would be helpful, too. > I'd like to get things building better, but don't want to waste effort on > dependencies that are proposed / planned for removal. I've tried to summarize the status quo here. http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tkbePBhOWTygbKL-oLfaiGQ&single=true&gid=0&output=html Since these dependencies are trivial to install on Ubuntu, we don't notice that much, but, as you can see, we are trying to remove many of them. Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
