I posted this via email on April 28 with a followup May 4. Since neither has appeared yet, I'm trying the web interface instead of email. --------- Dennis' (m00tpoint) message reminded me of something I've been meaning to ask for a while.
What exactly is the relationship between Tesseract and OCRopus these days? Are they just competitors to each other? My original understanding was the OCRopus was using the Tesseract recognition engine and was focusing on higher order issues like page segmentation/layout analysis, system integration, etc, but more recently I believe the Tesseract recognition engine has been replaced with either one built from scratch or one derived from a different source. Is this an accurate summary? Does anyone have a block diagram of the processing pipeline with the alternatives available for each stage in the pipe? Even better, one which includes an analysis of the strengths and weakness of the components relative to each other? (languages supported, error rates, etc) Thanks advance for any info. Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en.
