Please see this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus/browse_thread/thread/3bbb28b8e6ba6947/722eeaa44b0288ab?lnk=gst&q=tesseract#722eeaa44b0288ab
Tom On May 4, 6:40 pm, Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone? > > How about suggestions for a better forum in which to ask the question? > > Tom > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dennis' (m00tpoint) message reminded me of something I've been meaning > > to ask for a while. > > > What exactly is the relationship between Tesseract and OCRopus these > > days? Are they just competitors to each other? > > > My original understanding was the OCRopus was using the Tesseract > > recognition engine and was focusing on higher order issues like page > > segmentation/layout analysis, system integration, etc, but more > > recently I believe the Tesseract recognition engine has been replaced > > with either one built from scratch or one derived from a different > > source. Is this an accurate summary? > > > Does anyone have a block diagram of the processing pipeline with the > > alternatives available for each stage in the pipe? Even better, one > > which includes an analysis of the strengths and weakness of the > > components relative to each other? (languages supported, error rates, > > etc) > > > Thanks advance for any info. > > > Tom > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ocropus" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en.
