On 11/02/2008, David Bateman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonas Wagner wrote: > > | Seems fine to me. I committed it.. > > Ok, thanks a lot. > > > > Is backward compatibility an issue for those functions? Should they have > > the same signature / behaviour as their MATLAB counterpart? Because as > > stated, the patch actually changes the behaviour quite a bit and might > > break existing programs. > > Its more important to be compatible with th matlab behavior in general > as that is what people seem to expect of us.. I don't have access to the > histeq function for matlab and so can't confirm that the behavior is > matlab compatible however. >
When I wrote histeq is was (sort of) compatible with 1999 versions of Matlab. It is not worth trying to keep that compatbility. I agree with these changes. -- Andy Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1-613-520-2600x8785 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
