Jonas Wagner wrote: > | Seems fine to me. I committed it.. > Ok, thanks a lot. > > Is backward compatibility an issue for those functions? Should they have > the same signature / behaviour as their MATLAB counterpart? Because as > stated, the patch actually changes the behaviour quite a bit and might > break existing programs.
Its more important to be compatible with th matlab behavior in general as that is what people seem to expect of us.. I don't have access to the histeq function for matlab and so can't confirm that the behavior is matlab compatible however. D. -- David Bateman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
