David Bateman wrote:
Raymond E. Rogers wrote:
David Bateman wrote:
Could you work your changes up as a patch to the octave-forge SVN?
Regards
David
No problem, but I would really like to have it reviewed and tested
before somebody uses it seriously. I did ask about submitting things
for review/test earlier but got no response.
Typically we expect that octave-forge functions don't have the same
level of certainty in their performance as the Octave core functions,
and so I'd suggest just getting the patch into octave-forge. Also as I
don't expect the new functions effect the performance of any of the
exiting functions you won't break any existing code.. Could you work
this up as a patch today, as then it will be in the next octave-forge
release that Soren is working on?
regards
David
No it will not be done today. I just realized that the file I pulled from
http://octave.sourceforge.net/gsl/index.htm - gsl-1.0.4
does not match the svn octave-forge download version gsl-1.0.5. I must
recompile (and test) against the newer version.
It looks as though some of the problems I had during programing have
been addressed.
Ray
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
