Hi,
thanks for pointing this out. Actually, I was not aware that I used at
some ancient times the LGPL. Its fine with me changing the license to
"GPL v2 or later".
Nowawdays, I'm using "GPL v3 or later". Is there any specific reason not
to move to GPL v3 ?
Alois
Thomas Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> DESCRIPTION and contents.m say GPL2 or later, however the majority of
> .m files in inst/ say LGPL2 or later.
>
> So, which one is it?
> Bonus points if we can agree on just one license :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
