(It seems you didn't received my email, sorry for the noise.)

Hi.


Last week I wrote to the octave-dev mailing list reporting a bug and
contributing a test, as you can see at [SF mailarchive].

There has been no reply, and the svn version of the related package
(control) was not modified, as you can see at [SF svn].

Can you please tell me if you received my previous email?
If you didn't, can you please suggest me why my email was dropped?


Thanks.
Luca Favatella



[SF mailarchive]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=5a6cd4690811220713q59941de8hbe41e356df07dd0d%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=octave-dev

[SF svn] 
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/control/




On 22/11/2008, Luca Favatella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
> I'm referring to the svn version (of yesterday) of the control toolbox.
>
> Please add this xtest to gram function in the control toolbox.
>
> %!xtest
> %! a = [-1 0 0; 1/2 -1 0; 1/2 0 -1];
> %! b = [1 0; 0 -1; 0 1];
> %! m = gram (a, b);
> %! assert (a * m + m * a' + b *b', zeros (size (a)))
>
> This xtest shows that gram(a,b) doesn't behave as documented in
> texinfo (texinfo is correct).
>
>
> In the short term, a fix could be to modify gram invoking lyap with
> the right arguments.
> In fact it seems that who wrote gram relied on lyap behaving as the
> MATLAB counterpart.
>
> In the mid/long term, a fix could be to leave gram untouched and
> instead modify lyap to behave as the MATLAB counterpart.
>
>
> I prefer the second solution (i.e. modify lyap to behave as the MATLAB
> counterpart).
> Both Octave's and Scilab's lyap(a,b) behave the same (i.e. solving a'
> x + x a + b = 0), and the strange approach is that of MATLAB's
> lyap(a,b) (that instead solves a x + x a' + b = 0); but I think that
> it is better to target MATLAB compatibility.
> Do you think this could be done for Octave-Forge >= 3.1?
>
>
> I'm not attaching a patch to solve the problem because I think that
> the problem is not to write the patch but to decide one solution.
> If you have not spare time to write the patch, please let me know the
> decision and I'l try to post a patch by a week.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Luca Favatella

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to