Luca Favatella wrote: > (It seems you didn't received my email, sorry for the noise.)
No it seems to have been received > Last week I wrote to the octave-dev mailing list reporting a bug and > contributing a test, as you can see at [SF mailarchive]. Yes, I saw, however ... > There has been no reply, and the svn version of the related package > (control) was not modified, as you can see at [SF svn]. I didn't feel I was competent in the algorithmes used in gram/lyap to address your question/bug-fix properly.. So I'd hoped someone else would respond and help out (vain hope..)... Basically, in that case my feeling is that the person who is most expert in this code should have free run of the modifications and make the changes they believe are necessary.. I'd also say to go for matlab compatiability in the most cases unless there are good reasons not to. > Can you please tell me if you received my previous email? > If you didn't, can you please suggest me why my email was dropped? Its on the list, so it wasn't dropped.. As you are already subscribed as a developer and no one answered your question, I'd say that means you've inherited the lyap and gram functions :-) D. -- David Bateman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home) 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
