On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:02:20PM +0200, David Bateman wrote:
> Michael Goffioul wrote:
> > Just for the record, looking at the answer here
> >
> > http://www.ginac.de/pipermail/cln-list/2009-April/000513.html
> >
> > this guy won't stop at GiNaC/CLN. And he claims this is still
> > valid for GPLv3.
> >
> > Michael.
> >
> >
> From the thread the CLN author states he contacted licens...@fsf.org..
> Given his statements I doubt he asked a question is a sense that is to
> the benefit of a VC++/Octave release.. I'd still suggest contacting FSF
> for their position of distribution of the VC++ runtime binary installers
> on the basis of it being part of the compilation process.
I would add the very simple question whether an Octave package linking
the GPL2-only cln and the GPL3+ Octave can actually be distributed in
*any* sort of binary package.
Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today.
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
