Hi Please keep replies on the list, so everybody can follow.
tor, 21 01 2010 kl. 18:46 -0500, skrev Michael Villalba: > Thanks for your interest. My code is a replacement for Matlab's > maxflat.m > (http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/toolbox/signal/maxflat.html), > with a slightly different interface to improve usability. Does your function have a different interface or do you extend the Matlab interface? Experience shows that it often causes problems to have a function with the same name as a Matlab function, which doesn't have the same interface as its Matlab counterpart. > I agree that it > belongs in the 'signal' package with the other digital filter code. I > also > agree that for the sake of simplicity, only the native Octave/Matlab > code, > and not the Java wrapper, should be included. Okay, then I think we should get it included. I think the interface questions need to be resolved first, though. > I would be happy to modify the README file to reflect this. What would you write? I don't quite understand why you want to update the README file. Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
