Carlo de Falco wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2010, at 23:00, Lukas Reichlin wrote:
>
>>> Certainly. But at this event, only Windows machines were available and
>>> Matlab was already pre-installed. I had little options
>>> about the setup. (and i do not want to say it loud, but M is still
>>> faster, [1]. Admittingly, Octave has improved since 2006, and I see only
>>> difference by a factor of 2-3 instead of 4-5).
>>>
>>> [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0603001v1
>
> Do you still have the code to run those benchmarks at hand?
> It would be very interesting to compare how the speed of Octave changed
> between version 2.9.4 and 3.3,
> for a fair comparison you would need to run the tests on the same
> hardware though..
> c.
Yes, it is. Just install "Biosig for Octave and Matlab" from
http://biosig.sourceforge.net/download.html
and run
bench_biosig
which can be found in .../biosig/demo/
Alois
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
