On 21 December 2010 16:50, Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to take a look at creating a standard method of building rpms
> of octave packages for Fedora.  I'm starting with the old octave-forge
> package as a starting point.

Did you see these already?

     
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-octave/octave-pkg-dev.git;a=tree;h=c93c63e13b6d75feabd5e11329474f5e06439625;hb=c93c63e13b6d75feabd5e11329474f5e06439625

I'm not sure how easily could you turn that into a .spec files... But
the overall structure of a Makefile with targets and is similar to the
targets of a .spec. It doesn't address your concerns about end users
mixing Octave's pkg function and the system package manager, though.
On Debian, if I call pkg uninstall on a Debian-installed 'Forge
package, pkg reports that the package I want to uninstall isn't
installed. This seems sort of ok to me.

HTH,
- Jordi G. H.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of
Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even
within 7 months.  Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps:
an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your 
browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to