On 12/21/2010 4:14 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: > On 21 December 2010 16:50, Orion Poplawski<or...@cora.nwra.com> wrote: >> I'm starting to take a look at creating a standard method of building rpms >> of octave packages for Fedora. I'm starting with the old octave-forge >> package as a starting point. > Did you see these already? > > > http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-octave/octave-pkg-dev.git;a=tree;h=c93c63e13b6d75feabd5e11329474f5e06439625;hb=c93c63e13b6d75feabd5e11329474f5e06439625 > > I'm not sure how easily could you turn that into a .spec files... But > the overall structure of a Makefile with targets and is similar to the > targets of a .spec. It doesn't address your concerns about end users > mixing Octave's pkg function and the system package manager, though. > On Debian, if I call pkg uninstall on a Debian-installed 'Forge > package, pkg reports that the package I want to uninstall isn't > installed. This seems sort of ok to me. > > HTH, > - Jordi G. H. Thanks, I'll take a look. From first glance it doesn't appear to have more than what we're already doing, but we'll see.
- Orion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forrester recently released a report on the Return on Investment (ROI) of Google Apps. They found a 300% ROI, 38%-56% cost savings, and break-even within 7 months. Over 3 million businesses have gone Google with Google Apps: an online email calendar, and document program that's accessible from your browser. Read the Forrester report: http://p.sf.net/sfu/googleapps-sfnew _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
