ons, 16 02 2011 kl. 10:11 +0100, skrev Thomas Weber: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:07:46AM -0500, Nir Krakauer wrote: > > I don't personally do bioinformatics, but since the package > > corresponds to (a small part of) a Matlab toolbox it would be nice to > > keep it for possible future elaboration. > > I didn't mean to remove it. But quite obviously nobody cares about the > package: This test was probably failing all through Octave 3.2's > lifetime.
Should we have some way of signalling that a package is no longer maintained? We could write "Orphaned" as the package maintainer, would that be good? Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
