On 21 Oct 2011, at 19:28, Carnë Draug wrote: > Hmm.... you think it's really worth keep it in octave-forge if the > difference in speed is that small?
Your're right I'm not sure it's worth the effort of maintaining an extra function, so it's OK if you remove it > And if we were to remove it (and even if not, I'd like to know how to > do this), do you know how to mark C++ functions deprecated? I think > that for m functions is enough to move them into a deprecated > directory, but what about these cases? Thanks I'm not really sure and I cannot test at the moment, but I think the .oct file should go into "deprecated" > Carnë c. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
