On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:34 PM, c. <carlo.defa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 8 Nov 2011, at 16:07, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: > >> Hi, >> This looks good. >> I am just giving my coin in regard to the licencing. >> GPLv3 is a non-commercial licence (people can not use this code in >> programs user needs to pay for) >> LGPL is very similar but allows commercial use. >> Before deciding please check the rationale >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html > > Juan Pablo, > I think what you refer to as "commercial" in your message would be better > referenced as "proprietary", > I'm sure Jordi will jump in to correct that at some point, anyway ... :) > c.
c. You are right! please replace commercial by proprietary. -- M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal ----- PhD Student University of Zürich http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
