On 20111117@13:44, Robert T. Short wrote: > > If I understand correctly, the idea here is that including a wrapper > that allows a user to access non-free software is somehow a bad thing. > However, if you don't allow the wrapper users are NOT able to access the > non-free software. This seems to infringe on the user's right to choose > and therefore is a suppression of freedom. > > Just a thought. > > Bob
Bob, they were discussing whether to host the wrapper in the octave-forge repositories; not whether to allow or deny the wrapper use. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
