Am 18.11.2011 18:51, schrieb Robert T. Short:
> I understand that. If it isn't available from the website, at the
> very least it creates an obstacle to using it, and therefore is a
> suppression of freedom. A nonfree (sub)repository is a perfect
> place to give users access to stuff that may be useful even though
> it doesn't meet the standards of "freedom". I really can't see that
> there is any harm whatever.
>
> Michele Martone wrote:
>> On 20111117@13:44, Robert T. Short wrote:
>>
>>> If I understand correctly, the idea here is that including a
>>> wrapper that allows a user to access non-free software is
>>> somehow a bad thing. However, if you don't allow the wrapper
>>> users are NOT able to access the non-free software. This seems
>>> to infringe on the user's right to choose and therefore is a
>>> suppression of freedom.
>>>
>>> Just a thought.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>> Bob, they were discussing whether to host the wrapper in the
>> octave-forge repositories; not whether to allow or deny the wrapper
>> use.
May I add a point of view about that as a simple user of octave and
octave-forge:
I think it is perfectly reasonable if a company adds a wrapper to a free
software even if their own software is non-free, but in my opinion such
a wrapper package should be hosted on the site of the vendor of the
non-free software.
There are several reasons why I think this, where one reason is simply a
practical point of view and I will leave out my philosophical
considerations here:
Such a package is an addon to the proprietary software and as such makes
no sense without it, so as a customer I would expect to find it where
the software I buy comes from and not from anywhere else. Beside that,
if I find somewhere on some webpage such a wrapper software it is not
directly clear that it is something produced by the original vendor from
which I buy my proprietary software.

>From that I think it is better for both, the project which hosts and
provides free software due to more philosophical reasons (to which I
agree in most cases) as well as the vendor of the proprietary software
due to practical reasons.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to