On 24 April 2012 09:39, Lukas Reichlin <lukas.reichlin.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23.04.2012, at 22:23, Carnë Draug wrote: >> I'd like to remove the physicalconstants package. It only has a single >> function that returns the constant that is requested. Any suggestion >> on where to move it? > > How about a "legacy" folder (or "outdated" or …) besides the existing "main" > and "extra" folders on OctaveForge?
This separation on the svn repository is meaningless as it's completely invisible to the users when they are download the package. I believe it was meant for organization, the code in main was code that would later be moved into core while extra was code that was never intended with that purpose. If we could have a legacy section on the actual site, where the package list was visible... On 24 April 2012 09:57, marco atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com> wrote: > As they have general usage, I suggest miscellaneous where also units is > located Sounds good to me. Carnë ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
