On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 August 2012 16:23, John W. Eaton <j...@octave.org> wrote: >> On 20-Aug-2012, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: >> >> | On 20 August 2012 01:18, c. <carlo.defa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> | > What about following Matlab's naming conventions and using "toolbox" or >> "toolchest"? >> | >> | Might as well. People keep referring to OF packages as "toolboxes". >> | Alois for example uses this term exclusively to refer to the NaN >> | package. >> >> I would rather stay away from the term "toolbox" because, for example, >> "Control System Toolbox" is a registered trademark. > > What about using the, already quite standardized by other languages, > word module? > > Carnë
Single, Bundle, Module sounds good to me. Though I do not see why we are running away from Forge package. Are we going to drop all the Octave Forge presence? I think it may be wise to leave the "Forge" connection somewhere, otherwise it can get quite confusing for newcomers doing search on the internet and add to the general obscurity/misunderstanding. -- JuanPi Carbajal ----- "The bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil." - Frédéric Bastiat ----- http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
