I agree with JuanPi's point, abandoning the "forge" name abruptly might
cause some confusion. So I'd say let's use "forge" as a collective name for
all "modules", we could refer to the section of the site containing the
source repository documentation and released downloads of modules as
'forge'.
What do you think?
c.
On Aug 21, 2012 12:02 AM, "JuanPi" <ajua...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Carnë Draug <carandraug+...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 20 August 2012 1...
Single, Bundle, Module sounds good to me. Though I do not see why we
are running away from Forge package. Are we going to drop all the
Octave Forge presence? I think it may be wise to leave the "Forge"
connection somewhere, otherwise it can get quite confusing for
newcomers doing search on the internet and add to the general
obscurity/misunderstanding.
--
JuanPi Carbajal
-----
"The bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be
followed ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
