On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olaf Till <i7t...@t-online.de> wrote:
> I just saw that the same inacceptable change was proposed for the
> linear-algebra package and possibly also (?) for the optiminterp
> package. The same problem should also exist in the packages (not
> included in this patch) control, octgpr, and odepkg. One cannot just
> unconditionally hardcode the lapack library to link to only because
> the Mingw built of Octave can not handle a (hopefully) correct way to
> specify it. These lines in the Makefiles regarding the lapack linkage
> were introduced only recently into these packages after some
> discussion and some thinking.
>
To be honest, I don't think the idea was to integrate the changes as-is.
There has been complaints that Nitzan patches were not available and that
it was a GPL violation. So there they are. Whether you like them or not, or
whether they are "integratable" is not really relevant.
Michael.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
