Olaf Till-2 wrote > > > Please do not apply the patch for the optim package. I already > commented on this on another thread. This change is not > acceptable. Instead, the mingw-Octave package should be fixed so that > mkoctfile returns the correct flags. >
Olaf Till-2 wrote > > I just saw that the same inacceptable change was proposed for the > linear-algebra package and possibly also (?) for the optiminterp > package. The same problem should also exist in the packages (not > included in this patch) control, octgpr, and odepkg. One cannot just > unconditionally hardcode the lapack library to link to only because > the Mingw built of Octave can not handle a (hopefully) correct way to > specify it. These lines in the Makefiles regarding the lapack linkage > were introduced only recently into these packages after some > discussion and some thinking. > Regarding the missing LAPACK_LIB in octave mingw environment, I will try to fix that on next release (probably forthcoming 3.6.4) so hopefully these patches will not be required. Nitzan -- View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/My-patches-for-octaveforge-pkgs-Mingw-build-tp4644174p4644202.html Sent from the Octave - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
