On 25 November 2012 06:15, Julien Salort <li...@juliensalort.org> wrote: > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso > <jord...@octave.org> writes: > >> I've never been clear if this is really ok, but it seems to be a >> common interpretation. > > Fine. > But then, why did you encourage me publicly, on Feb. 8th, to publish the > sources ? > In case you don't remember, here is a link to the thread, entitled "Data > Acquisition with Octave": > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.octave.devel/6512/focus=39562 > > Personally, I was very reluctant to publish the sources because I feared > there would be a legal issue. You are one of the people who convinced me > that it is ok and that I should publish the source anyway.
I'm sorry. I made a mistake. I misunderstood the GPL. I got uncomfortable with now how there is Octave code that is meant to be linked to non-free libraries, so I asked again, and it seems I was wrong about it. Please unpublish this code. We do not want GPL-infringing Octave code out there. Instead, pressure the hardware providers to give you free libraries to the hardware that you already bought and thus you should own and do whatever you please with, including modfiying the libraries that talk to it. - Jordi G. H. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
